+- Pakistan Real Estate Times - Pakistan Property News (https://www.pakrealestatetimes.com)
+-- Forum: Pakistan Real Estate / Property News (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Latest Pakistan Property & Economic News (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Rawalpindi Property News : Rawalpindi Residents Get Served With Multiple Property Ta (/showthread.php?tid=15180)
Rawalpindi Property News : Rawalpindi Residents Get Served With Multiple Property Ta - Salman - 07-11-2013 12:01 AM
News
Zameen News
Zameen in the Press
Pakistan Property News
International Property News
Archived Releases
Year 2013 (71)
July (9)
June (20)
May (16)
April (13)
March (2)
February (2)
January (9)
Year 2012 (154)
Year 2011 (171)
Year 2010 (146)
Year 2009 (227)
Year 2008 (101)
Year 2007 (2)
Add to news service
Rawalpindi Residents Get Served With Multiple Property Taxes
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
The district government of Rawalpindi has imposed multiple taxes on the residents of Rawalpindi, Gujar Khan, Kallar Syedan, Murree, Taxila, Wah Cantt, Rawal town, and Potohar Town. The DCO announced 25 to 27 percent tax increase in the districts residential area when selling or buying property in these areas. Moreover, a 10 percent district collector’ s rate, two percent capital value tax, one per cent municipal tax and one per cent stamp duty has also been imposed on residential properties. The tax increase will be increased with immediate effect.
In addition to the above imposed heavy taxes, the government has levied taxes on the properties that had been leased to relatives.. This has completely crippled the power of purchase of the lower strata as individuals who could buy a single three Marla house for Rs 35,000 would now have to pay RS 75,000-80,000 with all the taxes imposed now. Those who are half way through with the transaction and property registration process have been halted right in their tracks and are ordered to pay 40 to 45 percent more to buy or sell their properties.
These impositions have caused complete uproar in people. The Rawalpindi District Bar Association Secretary and another advocate claimed that the decision was illegal and unconstitutional. They said they would be challenging the decision in high court. They stated that the DCO did not seek feedback from the citizens and imposed heavy taxes without any polling or consent.